The idea for this thread came about from the Bill Frisell thread I have linked here.
Let this be a place for us to talk about the strangeness ( and wonder if you like ) that is John Zorn.
Gregg and I have had many an email exchange about Zorn and we agree and disagree about him.
With regard to what has already been said on the Frisell thread and to get the conversational juices flowing, here is what I think:
- To me, Masada is the best thing John Zorn has ever done. It seems like an extension of Ornette Coleman's quartets of the 60's and the Jewish flavour is one of its strongest points and so is Joey Baron.
- With the regard to Fred's comment on William Parker as compared with Zorn :"William Parker, even though his roots are also in earlier decades, looks like he'll leave a more substantial musical legacy. " I totally agree...Parker seems to be more connected with meaning than Zorn and perhaps he should be the next candidate for the genius grant.
- Other than finding it plain awful, I don't see Zorn's Naked City project as anything more than a rebellious wall of sound. Like Fred, I do not believe generations looking back on music though the 80's, 90's and 2000's onwards will to Naked City as an essential peice of "artwork". I will not at least.
- Does Zorn deserve the genius status? I am not sure. It would depend who is doing the judging and what characteristics are being judged as genius. Myself, I see him as mainly experimental and can do without hearing most of his "music". <-- perhaps a cheap sentence but I have said it, and particularly mean the last half of it.